PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Polymers for Advanced Technologies2 citations

4D ‐Printed Biodegradable Mandibular Implant With Functionally Graded PLA / PEG and Tunable Infill Architecture for Minimally Invasive Reconstruction

View Full Paper
MEMeltem Eryildiz

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a biodegradable mandibular implant that mimics natural bone structure and supports minimally invasive insertion.
  • Developed a 4D-printed biodegradable implant using a graded PLA/PEG design.
  • Fabricated five infill architectures evaluated under compression testing relevant to jaw function.
  • Conducted shape-memory tests to assess recovery kinetics of different architectures.
  • Performed in vitro MTT assays to measure cell viability and metabolic activity.
  • The hexagonal infill achieved the highest compressive strength at 1226.97 N.
  • The gyroid architecture offered the best balance of strength, stiffness, and shape recovery.
  • Recovery dynamics varied, with the gyroid showing rapid recovery in about 120 seconds.
  • All designs supported cell viability, with the gyroid and hexagonal showing the highest metabolic activity over 72 hours.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Minimally invasive mandibular reconstruction is constrained by the difficulty of inserting anatomically shaped implants through small surgical openings, motivating the development of deployable scaffolds capable of controlled deformation and in situ expansion. In this study, a 4D‐printed biodegradable mandibular implant was developed using a functionally graded PLA/PEG shell–core design that mimics the cortical–trabecular organization of native bone. A stiff PLA/PEG 95/5 outer shell provided load‐bearing capacity and geometric stability, while a compliant PLA/PEG 70/30 inner core enabled thermally triggered shape‐memory behavior near‐physiological temperature. Five trabecular infill architectures (hexagonal, gyroid, grid, lines, and triangular) were fabricated via dual‐material fused deposition modeling and evaluated under buccolingual compression, relevant to mandibular bending during mastication. The hexagonal infill achieved the highest compressive strength (1226.97 N), whereas the gyroid architecture exhibited the most favorable balance of strength, stiffness, progressive post‐yield deformation, and shape recovery (83.76%). Shape‐memory tests revealed architecture‐dependent recovery kinetics, with the gyroid showing rapid and uniform recovery (~120 s), while grid and triangular patterns exhibited reduced recovery fidelity. Optical microscopy confirmed that continuous filament connectivity promotes stable mechanical and 4D behavior. In vitro MTT assays demonstrated that all scaffold designs supported cell viability, with gyroid and hexagonal architectures showing the highest metabolic activity over 72 h. The results demonstrate that combining material grading with tunable infill architecture enables a mandibular implant that is load‐capable, safely deformable for minimally invasive insertion, and reliably expandable in situ.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meltem Eryildiz (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6d9f5be6419ac0d52b6chttps://doi.org/10.1002/pat.70534
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Biodegradable Dual‐Material <scp>4D</scp> ‐Printed Scaffolds With Tunable <scp>PLA</scp> / <scp>PEG</scp> Ratios for Mandibular Bone Regeneration2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Design and evaluation of mechanical strength of multi-material polymeric implants for mandibular reconstruction2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Biomimetic 3D-printed gyroid scaffolds with versatile bioactive coatings for complex craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration2026
  4. 4Biomimetic 3D-printed gyroid scaffolds with versatile bioactive coatings for complex craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5In silico testing of a multimaterial scaffold for mandibular reconstruction2025