Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This essay examines Khlebnikov's zaum to reveal new philosophical possibilities in rationality, suggesting a redefined Futurist vision.
This essay returns to the origin of the Russian Futurist theory of zaum . The neologism has long been understood to mean a movement beyond rational discourse toward nonsense: za translates as "beyond" and um as "mind." In the work of Velimir Khlebnikov, the essay argues, experimentation with um as a root actually provides a more expansive, open-ended philosophical inquiry into the nature and possibilities of rationality itself. Even prior to the invention of zaum , and throughout his later career, Khlebnikov develops numerous poetic neologisms with um that propose a range of potential "kinds" of mind. These novel kinds of mind are all deemed rational. Thus, Khlebnikov rewrites the utopian stakes of the Futurist project: zaum is an imagined community, as well as a field of conceptual possibilities, opened up by an embrace of the many sources and forms of thought.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aurelia Cojocaru (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: