Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cytotoxicity and in-vivo studies reveal improved tumor suppression in skin cancer, indicating a novel treatment strategy.
ObjectiveSkin cancer is a widespread malignancy requiring advanced strategies to address poor skin permeation, drug resistance and low local bioavailability. This study aimed to develop and evaluate FU-CVD-loaded transethosomal gel for enhanced targeted skin cancer therapy.SignificanceConventional topical treatments often show inadequate dermal penetration and retention. The dual-drug transethosomal platform offers a novel approach to improve permeation, achieve sustained release, and enhance synergistic anti-cancer effects, which has not been previously reported for this drug combination in melanoma therapy.MethodsFU-CVD-loaded transethosomes (FU-CVD-TEs) were prepared using Lipoid S100, Tween-80, polyvinyl alcohol, and ethanol. Vesicles were characterized using TEM, SEM, and AFM. Optimized FU-CVD-TEs were incorporated into a Carbopol 934 with Poloxamer 188 hybrid gel and evaluated for rheology, dermatokinetics and in vitro cytotoxicity in HaCaT cells. In vivo studies in Wistar rats assessed dermal deposition, tumor suppression and skin tolerability.ResultsFU-CVD-TEs showed high entrapment efficiency, nanoscale size and sustained release following Higuchi kinetics (R² = 0.989). The hybrid gel displayed viscoelastic behavior. In vitro formulation enhanced ROS generation, induced G1-phase arrest and apoptosis, and showed significantly reduced IC₅₀. In vivo studies demonstrated markedly improved dermal deposition, strong tumor suppression, and excellent skin safety compared with conventional formulations.ConclusionThe FU-CVD-TE hybrid gel enhanced cutaneous permeation, therapeutic efficacy, and tumor-regression potential while maintaining a favourable safety profile. This strategy represents a promising and effective approach for melanoma treatment, warranting further molecular and clinical investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shinde et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: