Why the study?
Substantial evolution in stent technologies and risk stratification has yielded multiple antiplatelet treatment regimens after PCI balancing ischaemic and bleeding risks, warranting a summary of current evidence and future directions.
This State-of-the-Art review summarizes the rationale, evidence, and current guidelines for antiplatelet treatment regimens following percutaneous coronary intervention.
Reinforces evidence-based antiplatelet regimens post-PCI; confirms consensus while leaving optimal duration open amid evolving stents.
Antiplatelet therapy is key to reducing local thrombotic complications and systemic ischaemic events among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but it is inevitably associated with increased bleeding. The continuous refinement in stent technologies, together with the high incidence of ischaemic recurrences after PCI and the understanding of prognostic implications associated with bleeding, have led to a substantial evolution in antiplatelet treatment regimens over the past decades. Numerous investigations have been conducted to better stratify patients undergoing PCI according to their ischaemic and bleeding risks and to implement antithrombotic regimens accordingly. Evidence from these investigations have resulted in a number of antithrombotic treatment options as recommended by recent guidelines. In this State-of-the-Art review we provide the rationale, summarise the evidence, and discuss current and future directions of antiplatelet treatment regimens after PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angiolillo et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: