Why the study?
Improved risk stratification is needed to identify non-ischaemic heart failure patients who will benefit from primary prophylactic ICD implantation.
Does the presence of ventricular arrhythmia (NSVT or high PVC burden) identify non-ischaemic heart failure patients who benefit from primary prophylactic ICD implantation?
Does the presence of ventricular arrhythmia (NSVT or high PVC burden) identify non-ischaemic heart failure patients who benefit from primary prophylactic ICD implantation?
While ventricular arrhythmias (NSVT or high PVC burden) are associated with worse prognosis in non-ischemic heart failure, they do not identify patients who will specifically benefit from primary prophylactic ICD implantation.
NSVT or high PVC burden should not guide ICD selection in non-ischaemic HF; leaves open arrhythmia-based risk stratification.
Aims Improved risk stratification to identify non-ischaemic heart failure patients who will benefit from primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is needed. We examined the potential of ventricular arrhythmia to identify patients who could benefit from an ICD. Methods and results A total of 850 non-ischaemic systolic heart failure patients with left ventricle ≤35% and elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptides had a 24-h Holter monitor recording performed. We examined present non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), defined as ≥3 consecutive premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) with a rate of ≥100/min, and number of PVCs per hour stratified into low (<30) and high burden (≥30) groups. Outcome measures were overall mortality, sudden cardiac death (SCD), and cardiovascular death (CVD). In total, 193 patients died, 49 from SCD and 125 from CVD. Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (365 patients) was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07–2.03; P = 0.02] and to CVD (HR 1.89; CI 1.25–2.87; P = 0.003). High burden PVC (352 patients) was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR1.38; CI 1.00–1.90; P = 0.046) and with CVD (HR 1.78; CI 1.19–2.66; P = 0.005). There was no statistically significant association with SCD for neither NSVT nor PVC. In interaction analyses, neither NSVT (P = 0.56) nor high burden of PVC (P = 0.97) was associated with survival benefit from ICD implantation. Conclusion Ventricular arrhythmia in non-ischaemic heart failure patients was associated with a worse prognosis but could not be used to stratify patients to ICD implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boas et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: