Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis reports on surgical complications and survival in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing Total Mesorectal Excision.
Patients with early-stage (cT2-3N0) rectal cancer undergoing standard care upfront resection remain a poorly studied patient group with limited literature reporting the impact of adverse pathological features and surgical complications. This study aimed to characterise outcomes in patients with early-stage rectal cancer undergoing upfront Total Mesorectal Excision (TME). This is a retrospective, multi-centre, statewide study of patients with cT2-3N0 rectal adenocarcinoma without high-risk clinical staging characteristics (extramural vascular invasion [EMVI] or threatened/involved mesorectal fascia on MRI) undergoing upfront TME from 2013 to 2025 in South Australia. The main outcome measure was a composite of adverse pathological features, defined as: R1 resection, pT4 disease, nodal upstaging, or EMVI. Operative and oncological outcomes were collected and used to determine rates of Textbook Outcome (TO). The impact of adverse pathological features on 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analysed. Among 120 patients with cT2-3N0 rectal cancer undergoing upfront surgery, at least one adverse pathological feature was present in 35.8% of patients, increasing to 50% in patients with low rectal cancer. 3-year DFS rates were 84% (95% CI 75-93) without adverse pathological features, and 72% (95% CI 57-87) in patients with at least one adverse pathological feature (p = 0.167). 3-year OS rates were 94% (95% CI 88-100) without adverse pathological features, and 92% (95% CI 83-100) in patients with at least one adverse pathological feature (p = 0.617). TO was achieved in 57.5%, and 39.2% of patients experienced an ideal short term outcome (no adverse pathological features and TO achieved). There is a considerable margin, nodal and EMVI upstaging rate in patients with early-stage rectal cancer undergoing standard care upfront TME, particularly those with low tumours. This highlights the limitations of current clinical staging in rectal cancer, leading to early-staged patients potentially being undertreated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bunjo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: