Key result
Higher early post-resuscitation heart rate predicts ~3% lower odds of favorable neurological recovery per bpm.
Why the study?
Heart rate has prognostic value in cardiovascular disease and may provide similar insights following cardiac arrest, but its ability to predict functional recovery required investigation in a preclinical model.
Does early post-resuscitation heart rate predict survival with neurological recovery in a pig model of cardiac arrest?
Does early post-resuscitation heart rate predict survival with neurological recovery in a pig model of cardiac arrest?
In a porcine model of cardiac arrest, lower early post-resuscitation heart rate was independently associated with survival and favorable neurological recovery.
Does not support clinical adoption of heart rate targets; leaves open translation to human cardiac arrest cohorts.
Heart rate (HR), a readily available clinical parameter, has proven prognostic value in cardiovascular disease and may provide similar insights following cardiac arrest. This study investigated whether post-resuscitation HR might predict functional recovery in a preclinical porcine model of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Retrospective analyses were conducted in data from earlier prospective animal studies. Ninety-six pigs successfully resuscitated after 8 to 12 min of ischemically induced ventricular fibrillation, followed by 5 min of CPR prior to defibrillation attempt, were included in the study. HR, arterial and central venous pressures were continuously monitored for 4 hrs after resuscitation. Survival with neurological function was assessed up to 96 hrs post-resuscitation by the optimal performance category (OPC) score, with 1-2 considered as good outcome and 3-5 as poor outcome. Fifty-four animals (56%) presented a 96-hr good outcome, while 42 (44%) had a poor outcome. Animals with favourable neurological outcome showed significantly lower HR during the 4-hr post-resuscitation period compared with those with poor outcome (p<0.01). Lower HR, shorter no-flow and low-flow durations, higher diastolic, mean, and coronary perfusion pressures were associated with good outcome. However, only HR was an independent predictor of good neurological recovery (OR 0.971 [0.947-0.995] per 1 bpm increase); a HR > 135 bpm predicted poor outcome with 80% sensitivity and 70% specificity. In this model, lower post-resuscitation HR was independently associated with survival with favourable neurological recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giorgio et al. (2026) studied this question. Lower post-resuscitation heart rate predicted favorable neurological recovery with OR 0.971 per bpm increase; HR >135 bpm predicted poor outcome with 80% sensitivity and 70% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: