Key result
Higher Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index linked to up to ~221% greater risk of incident hypertension.
Why the study?
Evidence was lacking regarding the differential relationship between the Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index (CVAI) and the incidence of hypertension across participants with normal versus elevated blood pressure.
Does a higher Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index (CVAI) predict the incidence of hypertension in adults with normal or elevated baseline blood pressure?
Cohort (n=5,311)
Yes
Does a higher Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index (CVAI) predict the incidence of hypertension in adults with normal or elevated baseline blood pressure?
Effect estimate: Adjusted OR 1.77 (95% CI 1.32–2.38) in normal BP group for highest vs lowest CV AI quartile; Adjusted OR 3.21 (95% CI 2.26–4.61) in elevated BP group for highest vs lowest CV AI quartile (95% CI 1.32–2.38 (normal BP), 2.26–4.61 (elevated BP))
p-value: p=<0.001
The Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index is a strong, independent predictor of incident hypertension, particularly in individuals with elevated baseline blood pressure, offering a simple tool for risk stratification.
Hypertension is a significant global public health issue and its pathogenesis is strongly associated with visceral obesity. The Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index (CVAI), a well-established indicator based on the metabolic profile of Asian populations, has been linked to an increased risk of hypertension. However, there is a lack of comprehensive evidence regarding the differential relationship between the CVAI and the incidence of hypertension in participants with normal vs. elevated blood pressure (BP). This study aimed to utilize longitudinal data to examine the association between the CVAI and the incidence of hypertension across populations with different baseline BP levels. Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) database were used for this retrospective cohort analysis. Participants aged ≥45 years without hypertension at baseline (2011) were included and followed up until 2020 to assess the incidence of hypertension. The CVAI was calculated using a sex-specific formula incorporating age, waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Multivariate logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) models were used to evaluate the nonlinear association between CVAI and hypertension risk. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive ability of CVAI. For the sensitivity analyses, univariate RCS models were employed to assess the robustness of the findings. Among 5311 participants, 1,819 (34.25%) developed hypertension during the 9-year follow-up period. CVAI emerged as an independent risk factor for incident hypertension. Comparing the highest to the lowest quartile of CVAI, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.77 (95% CI: 1.32–2.38) in the normal BP group and 3.21 (95% CI: 2.26–4.61) in the elevated BP group. A linear dose-response relationship was observed between CVAI and hypertension risk in both groups. These associations remained robust and linear in sensitivity analyses after excluding participants with diabetes, heart disease, or stroke. Clinically, CVAI offers a simple, low-cost tool to improve hypertension risk stratification and enable earlier targeted prevention, particularly among individuals with elevated BP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Middle-aged and older Chinese adults (≥45 years) without hypertension at baseline (n=5,311). Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index (CV AI) as risk factor vs. Lowest quartile of CV AI was evaluated on 9-year cumulative incidence of hypertension (Adjusted OR 1.77 (95% CI 1.32–2.38) in normal BP group for highest vs lowest CV AI quartile; Adjusted OR 3.21 (95% CI 2.26–4.61) in elevated BP group for highest vs lowest CV AI quartile, 95% CI 1.32–2.38 (normal BP), 2.26–4.61 (elevated BP), p=<0.001). Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index predicted incident hypertension with an adjusted OR of 1.77 in normal BP and 3.21 in elevated BP individuals over 9 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: