PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery0 citations

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy for failing single ventricle physiology

View Full Paper
YTYuji TominagaHSHeima SakaguchiMTMasashi Takeshita

Key Result

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy improved ejection fraction from 30% to 40% (Group G) and 30% to 53% (Group F) with 5-year survival rates of 89% and 82%.

Key Points

  • This research evaluates the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with single ventricle and heart failure.
  • Retrospective review of patients who underwent therapy between 2010 and 2024
  • Defined dyssynchrony with QRS duration and echocardiography
  • Analyzed haemodynamic parameters and outcomes after treatment
  • Divided patients into groups based on prior surgical interventions
  • Improved ejection fraction in both groups (30-40% in Group G, 30-53% in Group F)
  • Increased cardiac index and NYHA class
  • 5-year survival rates of 89% for Group G and 82% for Group F
  • Fontan completion rate of 76% at 5 years in Group G
  • Stable hepatic function with no reported complications in Group F

Structured PICO

Does cardiac resynchronisation therapy improve systemic ventricular function and clinical outcomes in patients with failing single ventricle physiology and ventricular dyssynchrony?

P
Population
20 patients with single ventricle, heart failure, and ventricular dyssynchrony (defined as QRS duration ≥130 ms and qualitative mechanical dyssynchrony) (9 after bidirectional Glenn, 11 after Fontan completion).
I
Intervention
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT)
O
Outcome
Mid-term outcomes including systemic ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac index, NYHA class, brain natriuretic peptide, survival, Fontan completion rate, and hepatic functionsurrogate

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy improves systemic ventricular function and heart failure symptoms in patients with failing single ventricle physiology and ventricular dyssynchrony.

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with single ventricle, heart failure, and ventricular dyssynchrony, which leads to heart failure and poor outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with single ventricle who underwent cardiac resynchronisation therapy at our institution between 2010 and 2024. Dyssynchrony was defined as QRS duration ≥130 ms and qualitative mechanical dyssynchrony between the main and rudimentary ventricles assessed by echocardiography and cine-angiography. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy indications were based on acute haemodynamic studies (shortened QRS duration and increased peak dP/dt). The patients were divided into Groups G (cardiac resynchronisation therapy after bidirectional Glenn) and F (after Fontan completion). Haemodynamic parameters, NYHA class, brain natriuretic peptide, survival, Fontan completion rate, and hepatic function were analysed. RESULTS Group G included nine, and Group F included 11 patients. One year after cardiac resynchronisation therapy, the systemic ventricular ejection fraction improved in Groups G (30–40%, p = 0.006) and F (30–53%, p = 0.001), with corresponding increases in cardiac index and NYHA class. The median follow-up was 6.7 years (Group G) and 7.6 years (Group F). The 5-year survival rates were 89% and 82%, respectively. The Fontan completion rate was 76% at 5 years in Group G. In Group F, brain natriuretic peptide levels improved, hepatic function remained stable, and no protein-losing enteropathy was reported. CONCLUSIONS Cardiac resynchronisation therapy improved systemic ventricular function and heart failure symptoms. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy might be a viable therapeutic option for patients with single ventricle, ventricular dyssynchrony, and heart failure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tominaga et al. (2026) studied this question. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy improved ejection fraction from 30% to 40% (Group G) and 30% to 53% (Group F) with 5-year survival rates of 89% and 82%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9da0482488d673cd392bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezag105
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of the Rudimentary Chamber on Outcomes in Fontan Patients2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Various Systemic Ventricular Morphologies in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease2015 · 40 citations
  3. 3Long‐term outcomes of pacemaker implantation in children with univentricular versus complex biventricular surgical repair2023 · 5 citations
  4. 4Effects of Multisite Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Intraventricular Conduction Delay2001 · 2,766 citations
  5. 5Low-dose dobutamine induces left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and a narrow QRS: A study using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography2013 · 9 citations