Case report examines challenges in managing high-altitude pulmonary edema in a military officer, suggesting improved prophylaxis is needed.
This case report delves into the challenges in diagnosis and management of a 30-year-old Army Special Forces officer who experienced respiratory distress during high-altitude training in Nepal, where he gained 3,000m in elevation over 3 days. Notably, the patient was prophylactically treated with acetazolamide but did not receive nifedipine or tadalafil. At an elevation of 13,550 feet (4,130m), the patient developed classic high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) symptoms as well as concomitant respiratory symptomatology of breathlessness and worsening productive cough. The complexity of this case lay in managing HAPE in a remote, resource-limited environment with a small rescue window. We analyze the treatment alternatives used and ones not used, such as the portable hyperbaric chamber, and emphasize the necessity for standard-ized HAPE prophylaxis in appropriate personnel to prevent disruption to mission and loss of operational capabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodriguez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: