Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study compares complications after degradable stent versus ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery, indicating similar outcomes.
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication of low anterior resection (LAR) of rectal cancer. While ileostomy is the most commonly used method for AL alleviation, it has associated risks of permanent stoma and stoma-related complications, and also requires additional surgery. The aim of this study was to explore the use of a novel technique to protect the anastomosis after LAR. Sixty-five patients were randomly assigned to an LAR combined with degradable stent group (n = 32) or an LAR combined with ileostomy group (n = 33). The study was conducted between January 2023 and December 2024. Demographic information, laboratory findings, surgical results, and tumor characteristics were recorded. One case of anastomotic stricture (3%) and four cases of intestinal obstruction (12.5%) were observed in the LAR + degradable stent group, and two cases of intestinal obstruction (6%) occurred in the LAR + ileostomy group. No complications, such as abscesses, bleeding, bowel perforation, and anastomotic leakage, were observed in either group. There was no difference in short-term postoperative complications between patients treated with degradable stent or ileostomy, suggesting that the potential of degradable stents as a novel method of preventing anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of rectal cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: