Retrospective study evaluates disease patterns and max SUV for predicting survival in pediatric LCH, suggesting new prognostic insights.
Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of disease distribution patterns and the baseline metabolic parameter, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ), on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET-computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT) in pediatric patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). Methodology This retrospective study included 63 histopathologically confirmed LCH patients aged 1–18 years who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT between August 2013 and 2025. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were reviewed, including system involvement; risk and critical organ involvement; treatment regimens; survival time; and outcomes. Baseline SUV max and disease distribution patterns were correlated with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Of 63 patients, 40 (63.5%) were male and 23 (36.5%) females. Single-system involvement was observed in 32 (51%) patients, while 31 (49%) had multisystem disease. Risk-organ involvement (RO+) occurred in 12 (38.7%) multisystem patients, and critical organ involvement in 10 (32.2%). Diabetes insipidus was present in nine (14%) patients. Mean SUV max was significantly higher in deceased patients than survivors (6.7 ± 1.8 vs. 4.7 ± 3.0; P = 0.01). Ten-year EFS was significantly better in single-system LCH than multisystem LCH (90.6 vs. 64.5%; P = 0.03) and worse in RO+ multisystem LCH than without risk-organ–involvement multisystem LCH (50 vs. 73.7%). Ten-year OS was higher in single-system LCH than multisystem LCH (93.8 vs. 74.2%; P = 0.04) and lower in RO+ multisystem LCH (50 vs. 89.5%; P = 0.01). Conclusion Single-system LCH demonstrates significantly better survival outcomes than multisystem LCH, particularly without risk-organ involvement. Baseline SUV max appears to be a promising prognostic imaging biomarker for predicting outcomes in pediatric LCH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sikandar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: