Diagnostic performance of salivary siglec-5 assessed in Sjögren disease and non-Sjögren sicca, suggesting enhanced biomarker utility.
Sjögren disease (SjD) has a multifactorial pathogenesis that is not fully understood. Perceptions of disease severity shape healthcare-seeking behavior and engagement with diagnostic assessments, underscoring the need for objective biomarkers. Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (siglecs) have emerged as relevant mediators in SjD immunopathology. To investigate the diagnostic performance of siglec-5 expression in minor salivary gland (MSG) tissue and saliva samples from individuals with SjD and non-Sjögren sicca (nSS). A total of 109 participants with SjD and 41 with nSS were included. Salivary concentrations of siglec-5/siglec-14, inflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-8, IFN-γ, IgA, IgG, nitric oxide [NO]), and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) were measured. Immunohistochemical analyses of siglec-5, CD20, and CD3 were performed on MSG specimens. The data were analyzed descriptively and analytically. Salivary levels of siglec-5/siglec-14, IgA, IgG, NO, and NETs were significantly higher in the SjD group compared to the nSS group. Elevated salivary levels of siglec-5/siglec-14, IL-6, and IgG were found among individuals with severe dryness scores. Immunohistochemical staining for siglec-5 was more pronounced in SjD samples and significantly associated with CD20 and CD3 positivity as well as the presence of xerophthalmia. Tissue infiltration by siglec-5 had greater diagnostic accuracy for SjD (area under the curve: 73.1% [95% confidence interval: 58.2–85]) than both salivary and ocular sicca tests. Siglec-5 expression was increased in individuals with SjD, supporting its involvement in disease pathogenesis as well as its potential usefulness as a biomarker. The availability of objective salivary and tissue markers may improve diagnostic pathways for SjD, thereby facilitating patient engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: