Simulation experiments explore the characteristics of DC arcs during pantograph-catenary separation, indicating the role of voltage and motion.
The pantograph–catenary system is a critical component of the traction power supply network. Due to hard points on the overhead contact line and vibrations of the pantograph, pantograph–catenary separation may occur, leading to offline DC arc events. To investigate the characteristics of DC arcs generated during pantograph–catenary separation in metro systems, this study constructs a laboratory platform that simulates the offline process and analyzes the electrical characteristics, optical intensity, and arc-burn duration under different electrode separation conditions. First, a DC pantograph–catenary offline arc simulation platform is developed using a contact wire, a carbon-strip pantograph slider, and a linear motor, enabling slider movement in both horizontal and vertical directions. Second, offline discharge experiments are conducted to compare the discharge process and electrical arc characteristics with and without horizontal slider motion. Finally, arc luminosity and burn duration are measured under various electrode separation configurations, and the influence of voltage level, current level, and electrode material is examined. Experimental results reveal a significant polarity effect, where the arc burn duration is notably longer when the contact wire serves as the cathode than when the carbon slider serves as the cathode. At the instant of separation, the high electric field intensity within the micro-gap triggers pronounced “peak phenomena” in both arc resistance and power, accompanied by abrupt voltage surges and transient current dips. Furthermore, the introduction of horizontal motion modulates the arcing process, causing the stable arcing voltage to follow a distinctive trend of a slow increase followed by a gradual decrease, which differs from static separation characteristics. Finally, this study demonstrates that voltage levels exert a more dominant influence on arc luminosity and duration than current levels, while the maintenance voltage of the arc channel remains significantly lower than the air breakdown voltage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: