Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis finds ixazomib therapies effective in multiple myeloma, indicating better outcomes with less pretreatment.
Background: Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Our study aimed to analyze the efficacy and tolerability of ixazomib-based combination therapies. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 126 patients with RRMM and other plasma cell neoplasms. Results: The median age was 65 years, with a median of two prior therapy lines, and 16.7% were triple-class refractory. The overall response rate (ORR) was 52.5%; triple-class refractory patients had a significantly lower ORR than non-refractory controls (10.5% vs 60.2%, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 27.0 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months (95% CI: 6.9–11.0), and the median overall survival (OS) was 84.1 months (95% CI: 68.1–not reached). In multivariate analysis, a glomerular filtration rate of ⩽70 ml/min/1.73 m 2 was linked to worse PFS (hazard ratio (HR): 2.11, p = 0.008) and OS (HR: 7.27, p = 0.003). Furthermore, triple-class refractory patients showed a trend toward inferior PFS (HR: 3.76, p = 0.05) and significantly worse OS (HR: 20.46, p = 0.002) compared to non-refractory patients. Grade ⩾3 hematologic adverse events occurred in 15.1% patients, while the most common non-hematologic adverse events were fatigue (5.6%) and peripheral neuropathy (26.2%), with the majority classified as grade 1–2. Conclusion: Altogether, ixazomib regimens are potent in RRMM but are less effective in heavily pretreated patients and those with renal impairment, suggesting earlier use may yield greater benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: