Key result
SGLT2 inhibitors cut ventricular arrhythmias ~62% vs. control in ICD patients.
Why the study?
Does SGLT2 inhibitor therapy reduce ventricular arrhythmias and ICD shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,605)
Does SGLT2 inhibitor therapy reduce ventricular arrhythmias and ICD shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators?
In patients with ICDs, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduce the burden of ventricular arrhythmias, SVT, and ICD shocks, alongside lowering cardiovascular mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May reduce ventricular arrhythmia burden in ICD patients; extends limited evidence but leaves open need for larger RCTs.
INTRODUCTION: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve outcomes in heart failure (HF), but their effect on arrhythmias is less clear. Patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are a high risk population for ventricular arrhythmias. However, the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on ventricular arrhythmias remains a source of debate. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception to August 19, 2025, for studies evaluating SGLT2 inhibitors and arrhythmic/cardiovascular outcomes. Pooled mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 1,605 patients were included in our analysis. SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of ventricular arrhythmia (RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.81; p = 0.01), ventricular tachycardia (RR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.88; p = 0.009), and supraventricular tachycardia (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.95; p = 0.02). No significant effect was observed on non-sustained VT (RR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.67; p = 0.83). However, SGLT2 inhibitors were also associated with a significant reduction in ICD shocks (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.64; p < 0.00001) and cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.70; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In ICD patients, SGLT2 inhibitor therapy significantly reduced ventricular arrhythmias, discrete sustained VT, and SVT, with secondary analyses suggesting fewer ICD shocks and reduction in CV mortality in the patients with ICD.
Jha et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) (n=1,605). SGLT2 inhibitors vs. Placebo or usual care was evaluated on Total ventricular arrhythmia (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.81, p=0.01). SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of total ventricular arrhythmia compared to control in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: