Key result
Resting heart rate >80 bpm in hospitalized AF is linked to ~79% higher in-hospital complications.
Why the study?
Does a resting heart rate exceeding 80 bpm increase the risk of in-hospital mortality and acute heart failure in patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=12,775)
Yes
Does a resting heart rate exceeding 80 bpm increase the risk of in-hospital mortality and acute heart failure in patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation?
In patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation, a resting heart rate above 80 bpm is associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality and acute heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant RHR control ≤80 bpm in hospitalized AF; extends prior rate-control data but leaves causality unproven.
Background: Effective rate control is important in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the relationship between resting heart rate (RHR) and adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients remains uncertain. Objective: This study was to evaluate the association between RHR and in-hospital outcomes. Methods: Data from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-AF project from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital all-cause mortality and in-hospital acute heart failure (AHF). Secondary outcomes included stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and bleeding during hospitalization. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between RHR and outcomes. Results: Our study included 12,775 patients hospitalized for AF in 236 hospitals. Logistic regression analyses using different models showed a significant association between RHR exceeding 80 bpm and an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted OR: 1.79 [95% CI: 1.44-2.22]). A positive association between RHR and the primary outcome was identified with RHR ≥ 80 bpm. Marginal effect analyses showed that patients with advanced AF types were at higher risk across the range of RHR. Conversely, catheter ablation, but not antiarrhythmic drug use, was associated with a decreased risk. Conclusion: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02309398.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=12,775). Resting heart rate > 80 bpm vs. Resting heart rate ≤ 80 bpm was evaluated on Composite of in-hospital all-cause mortality and in-hospital acute heart failure (AHF) (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.44-2.22). A resting heart rate >80 bpm in hospitalized atrial fibrillation patients was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality and acute heart failure (adjusted OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.44-2.22).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: