Key result
Pharmacist-led telehealth linked to significantly greater SBP reduction over time vs. usual care.
Why the study?
Does a centralized pharmacist-led telehealth model utilizing home blood pressure monitoring improve blood pressure control in adults with uncontrolled hypertension?
Cohort (n=1,764)
Does a centralized pharmacist-led telehealth model utilizing home blood pressure monitoring improve blood pressure control in adults with uncontrolled hypertension?
p-value: p=<0.0001
A pharmacist-led telehealth intervention utilizing home blood pressure monitoring significantly improves blood pressure control and quality measure pass rates in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
Supports wider adoption of pharmacist telehealth integrating HBPM; reinforces evidence for remote hypertension care.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a centralized pharmacist-led telehealth model utilizing home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) readings on hypertension quality measure pass rates and blood pressure reduction at 3 and 6 months. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. METHODS: Adults with uncontrolled hypertension (≥ 140/90 mm Hg) were identified through a centralized outreach model. Patients who completed a visit with a pharmacist comprised the intervention group; those who were not reached or who declined were included in the usual care group. Pharmacists met with patients via telehealth appointments and sent recommendations to their providers. RESULTS: A total of 1776 patients were included: 179 patients in the intervention group and 1597 patients in usual care. The mean age was 56 years (95% CI, 55.7-57.0 years), with approximately half identifying as female (47.6%-53.1%). The intervention group had a higher proportion of Black patients (53.1% vs 37.3%; P = .0002) and a higher mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score (2.93 vs 2.54; P = .0016). Patients in the pharmacist intervention group were more likely to pass the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set Controlling Blood Pressure measure (2022: OR, 1.78; P = .014; 2023: OR, 1.75; P = .014). Greater systolic blood pressure reductions in the intervention group vs usual care were observed at both 3 months (-12.69 vs -5.69 mm Hg; P < .0001) and 6 months (-13.87 vs -9.05 mm Hg; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Participating in telehealth visits integrating HBPM readings with a pharmacist between primary care visits significantly improves blood pressure control. Pharmacists play a critical role in actively engaging patients and optimizing medication therapy in team-based care for chronic hypertension management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolverton et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=1,764). Pharmacist-led telehealth intervention (CAMP) vs. Usual Care was evaluated on Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) (p=<0.0001). A pharmacist-led telehealth intervention significantly improved systolic blood pressure over time compared to usual care (time-by-group interaction p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: