PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Relationship Between Blood Pressure Changes and Evolution of White Matter Hyperintensity Volume on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

View Full Paper
CSChenzhen ShenShandong First Medical UniversityHXHui XuShenyang Pharmaceutical UniversityJQJianfeng QiuShandong First Medical University

Key Result

In patients with Fazekas score 1, systolic blood pressure changes significantly affected white matter hyperintensity volume change (Adj. p < 0.05), but not at higher scores.

Key Points

  • This study investigates how changes in blood pressure relate to white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume in patients over time.
  • Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 466 patients with two MRI examinations.
  • WMH volume measured using T1-FLAIR and T2-FLAIR images with MATLAB.
  • Statistical analysis using nonparametric independent-samples tests to explore relationships between WMHv and SBP.
  • WMH volume was positively correlated with age, number of lesions, and Fazekas score.
  • Initial and subsequent measurements showed strong associations between WMH volume change and these factors.
  • Significant effects of blood pressure changes on WMHv were observed only at Fazekas scores of 1 or 2.

Structured PICO

Do changes in systolic blood pressure affect the evolution of white matter hyperintensity volume on MRI?

P
Population
466 patients who underwent two cranial magnetic resonance imaging examinations at 11- to 14-month intervals
I
Intervention
Changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP)
O
Outcome
Change in white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHv) measured on T1-FLAIR and T2-FLAIR imagessurrogate

Adjusting systolic blood pressure may help regulate white matter hyperintensity volume in patients with early-stage white matter changes (Fazekas score 1).

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Hypertension may be a cause of white matter hyperintensity (WMH), but how changes in blood pressure relate to changes in WMH remains unclear. This study aims to clarify the relationship between them. Methods Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 466 patients who underwent two cranial magnetic resonance imaging examinations with the lesion segmentation toolbox at 11‐ to 14‐month intervals at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University. Patients were categorized according to baseline clinical data, including sex, systolic blood pressure (SBP), age, and Fazekas score. WMH volume (WMHv) was measured on T1‐FLAIR and T2‐FLAIR images using MATLAB R2019b software. WMHv before and after magnetic resonance imaging, along with related clinical data, were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 26. Nonparametric independent‐samples tests were used to assess the relationship between WMHv and SBP within each group. Results WMH was associated with initial age (r = 0.22, p 0.05). Further analysis revealed that the initial number of lesions (r = 0.16, p 0.05). Only when the Fazekas score was 1 or 2, did blood pressure changes significantly affect WMHv (Adj. p < 0.05). Pairwise comparative analysis showed that only Fazekas score 1 was statistically significant. Conclusions At Fazekas score 1, adjusting SBP may help regulate WMHv. At higher Fazekas scores, SBP change showed no effect on WMHv.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2026) studied this question. In patients with Fazekas score 1, systolic blood pressure changes significantly affected white matter hyperintensity volume change (Adj. p < 0.05), but not at higher scores.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70d6531e4c4a9ff5b0c4https://doi.org/10.1002/ird3.70052
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper