This argument presents a logic-neutral foundation for the law of non-contradiction, suggesting broader applicability across different logical systems.
I offer a new argument for the principle that there are no true contradictions. Because the argument relies mostly on extra-logical premises and is valid in a wide range of logics (including certain paraconsistent logics), it offers a logic-neutral justification of the law of non-contradiction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martín Abreu Zavaleta (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: