Prospective pilot study reveals the correlation between FiO2 and PaO2 in patients under general anesthesia, suggesting optimal levels for oxygen delivery.
Background Hyperoxemia and prolonged oxygen exposure were common during general anesthesia. However, the relationship between FiO 2 and PaO 2 in patients undergoing general anesthesia with dual lung ventilation remained unclear. This prospective pilot study aimed to explore this relationship. Methods A cohort of 50 patients was recruited for this self-controlled, prospective pilot study. A standardized volume-controlled ventilation strategy was applied, with FiO 2 initially set to 0.3 immediately after tracheal intubation. FiO 2 was then increased in steps of 0.1 until it reached 0.6, followed by an increase to 0.8. Each FiO 2 step was maintained for at least 30 min before blood samples were drawn for blood gas analysis at each point. Results Rmcorr analyses revealed a significant correlation between FiO 2 and PaO 2 ( p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient ( r ) was 0.967 and Model convergence was robust, with a gradient value of 0.00003. At an FiO 2 of 40, 78.0% of patients maintained PaO 2 between 100 and 200 mmHg, while more than 68.0% exceeded 200 mmHg at 50% FiO 2 levels. Rmcorr analysis revealed a weak but statistically significant correlation between FiO 2 and PaO 2 /FiO 2 ( r = 0.290; p < 0.001). Conclusion A significant linear correlation was identified between FiO 2 and PaO 2 during general anesthesia with dual-lung ventilation. In this prospective pilot study, our findings suggested that maintaining 40% FiO 2 was generally sufficient for most patients to achieve PaO 2 levels of 100–200 mmHg, unless specific clinical conditions require otherwise. Importantly, FiO 2 need not exceed 50% in most patients undergoing general anesthesia with dual-lung ventilation. Clinical trial registration http://www.chictr.org.cn , identifier ChiCTR2500095383.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: