Key result
An induction oxygen fraction of 60% failed to show non-inferiority to 100% oxygen, resulting in a higher incidence of hypoxemia during anesthesia induction (3.9% vs 0%, p=0.167 for non-inferiority).
Why the study?
High inspiratory oxygen fraction is associated with increased perioperative pulmonary morbidity and postoperative mortality, yet pure oxygen is still currently recommended during anesthesia induction.
Does 60% inspiratory oxygen fraction compared to 100% oxygen prevent hypoxemia during induction of general anesthesia in noncardiac surgery patients?
RCT (n=302)
Open-label
Permuted blocks of 10 using a computer-generated list (1:1 ratio)
Yes
Does 60% inspiratory oxygen fraction compared to 100% oxygen prevent hypoxemia during induction of general anesthesia in noncardiac surgery patients?
While 60% oxygen during anesthesia induction is inferior to 100% oxygen for preventing induction hypoxemia, 100% oxygen may increase the risk of post-extubation desaturation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
60% oxygen is not noninferior to 100% for preventing hypoxemia during induction; supports standard 100% use and challenges lower FiO2 strategies.
Background. High inspiratory oxygen fraction (FIO 2 ) is associated with increased perioperative pulmonary morbidity and postoperative mortality. However, the use of pure oxygen is still currently recommended during the anesthesia induction. Methods, This open-label randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted in two metropolitan hospitals at Southern Taiwan. A total of 302 surgical patients (ASA PC≤III) who received endotracheal general anesthesia (ETGA) were randomized to receive 100% (FIO 2 1.0) or 60% (FIO 2 0.6) oxygen during induction. The primary endpoint was presence of hypoxemia (SpO 2 ≤92%) during the induction of anesthesia. The secondary endpoint was the development of major complications immediately and within 3 days after surgery. Results. A total of 5 patients in the FIO 2 0.6 group developed hypoxemia during induction (3.9% vs 0% for FIO 2 0.6 vs FIO 2 1.0, respectively; P=0.167 for non-inferiority), suggesting that FIO 2 0.6 was inferior than FIO 2 1.0 for anesthesia induction. The mean lowest SpO 2 during induction was also significantly lower in FIO 2 0.6 group. Four patients reached the primary endpoint had increased body mass indexes (BMI>30 kg/m 2 ). However, the overall incidence of desaturation developed after removal of endotracheal tube was higher in FIO 2 1.0 group (1.4% vs 5.8%, FIO 2 0.6 vs FIO 2 1.0; odd ratio 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.05-1.05; P=0.064). Conclusions. High fractions of oxygen should be used for oxygenation during induction of ETGA in general population, especially in the obese patients. However, the supplement of high FIO2 during induction was associated with increased hypoxemic events after removal of endotracheal tube that might have a more significant impact on perioperative care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Surgical patients requiring endotracheal general anesthesia (n=302). 60% inspiratory oxygen fraction (FIO2 0.6) vs. 100% inspiratory oxygen fraction (FIO2 1.0) was evaluated on Development of arterial desaturation (SpO2 ≤ 92%) during the induction of anesthesia (p=0.167 for non-inferiority). An induction oxygen fraction of 60% failed to show non-inferiority to 100% oxygen, resulting in a higher incidence of hypoxemia during anesthesia induction (3.9% vs 0%, p=0.167 for non-inferiority).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: