PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Study of serum Neprilysin level in chronic kidney disease patients

View Full Paper
AEAsmaa Hassan Abd El-AzizWMWaleed S. MohamedGAGhada Mahmoud Alghazaly

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore serum Neprilysin levels in patients at various stages of chronic kidney disease.
  • Cross-sectional pilot study involving 75 CKD patients and 20 healthy controls.
  • Participants underwent clinical assessments and laboratory tests including serum NEP measurement by ELISA.
  • Patients classified into CKD stages 1-5 based on KDIGO guidelines.
  • Serum NEP levels significantly elevated in CKD patients compared to healthy controls.
  • Levels increased in advanced stages of CKD, particularly stages 3-5 vs stage 1.
  • NEP correlated positively with blood urea, serum creatinine, and albumin creatinine ratio, and negatively with hemoglobin and eGFR.

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined by a gradual decline in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) over time, progressing toward more advanced stages. The study aimed to investigate serum Neprilysin (NEP) levels in patients at different stages of CKD to evaluate its role in diagnosis and progression of CKD. A cross-sectional pilot, study included 75 CKD patients classified according to KDIGO into five stages (stages 1–5) and 20 healthy controls. Participants underwent clinical assessment, laboratory tests (complete blood count, blood urea, serum creatinine, urine albumin to creatinine ratio, liver function tests, blood glucose, HbA1c and lipid profile, estimation of GFR eGFR) and serum NEP measurement by ELISA. NEP levels were significantly elevated in CKD patients relative to the normal control group (p1 = 0.002, p2 and p5 168.0 and distinguished between patients with eGFR < 60 and ≥ 60 at ˃248.5 with 80% accuracy. Serum NEP were significantly higher in patients with CKD compared with controls and were associated with markers of renal dysfunction so, it could be a complementary biomarker in CKD. However, stage-wise differences should be interpreted cautiously after correction for multiple comparisons.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

El-Aziz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4adb518185d8a398016ebhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-026-00607-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1New Creatinine- and Cystatin C–Based Equations to Estimate GFR without Race2021 · 4,431 citations
  2. 2Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition versus Enalapril in Heart Failure2014 · 6,964 citations
  3. 3Renal and Hormonal Effects of Chronic Inhibition of Neutral Endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.11) in Normal Man1993 · 27 citations
  4. 4Hematological changes in patients of chronic renal failure and the effect of hemodialysis on these parameters2017 · 28 citations
  5. 5Human T, B, natural killer, and dendritic cells arise from a common bone marrow progenitor cell subset1995 · 685 citations