Background: This proof-of-concept study aims to determine whether the haemodynamic effect of saphenous treatment can be predicted using the saphenous occlusion test (SOT). Materials and methods: Fifteen legs (11 patients) with chronic venous disease and 12 legs of healthy controls were assessed using air plethysmography (APG) on a manually operated tilt table transitioning from near-standing to a -40° head-down position and back to control leg filling via APG. Measurements were taken: (i) preoperatively, (ii) during ultrasound-guided compression of the saphenous vein at the thigh (SOT), and (iii) after treatment of the GSV with proximal short-segment endovenous laser ablation (EVLA, not the controls). Clinical CEAP classification: C2 = 2, C3 = 4, C4a = 10, and C6 = 1, median Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) of 5 [2-14]. Median follow 73 [30-89] days. Results: Both, the venous filling index (VFI, mL/s) and venous filling time (VFT90, in seconds) improved significantly with GSV probe compression and EVLA (p < .0005): VFI from baseline 2.6[2-3.3] and predicted 1.2 [1.1-1.6] to postoperative 1.3 [1.1-1.7], VFT90 from baseline 34.7 [23.8-40.1] and predicted 71.4 [46-89.9] to 70.7 [47.9-76]. No significant difference was found between the predicted and actual post-treatment values for VFI (p = .601) or VFT90 (p = 1). Significant difference between controls and patients (VFT90 p < .01, VFI p < .001) was lost after treatment (VFT90 p = .751, VFI p = .826). Conclusions: The haemodynamic effect of saphenous reflux correction can be accurately predicted using the saphenous occlusion test with APG together with orthostatic manoeuvres. This method may serve as a standardised, objective tool to evaluate the need for GSV intervention in patients with visible varicose veins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendoza et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: