Conceptual analysis identifies tensions in global schooling and social justice, indicating complex interactions.
This conceptual article identifies tensions and dilemmas that cut across global schooling and social justice, albeit in context-rooted and multifaceted ways. We pay particular attention to social justice dilemmas and tensions, and oscillations between them in school governance, curriculum, and identities. We argue that a global analytical tool for enhancing a socially just approach to schooling must include (1) a redistribution of resources, (2) principles of curriculum justice supporting powerful and locally relevant knowledge and avoiding labelling and marginalization, and (3) non-material aspects, such as support for empowerment, personal dignity, care, and representation. A global lens simultaneously highlights national and supranational cultures and dynamics. It implies a focused approach on continuities and discontinuities in governance arrangements from a historical perspective, as well as a spatial approach to variations in pedagogical cultures, encompassing societal, political, and personal values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mincu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: