Key result
3DE strongly correlates with CMR for RV volume but underestimates EF in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot.
Why the study?
RV dysfunction is a major complication in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot, but gold-standard CMR is limited by accessibility and cost, making 3DE a promising alternative.
Does three-dimensional echocardiography accurately evaluate right ventricular size and function compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot?
Does three-dimensional echocardiography accurately evaluate right ventricular size and function compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot?
Three-dimensional echocardiography is a feasible complementary tool to CMR for assessing right ventricular volumes and function in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot, despite modest underestimation of parameters.
3DE may complement CMR for RV assessment in repaired ToF; extends validation but leaves EF interchangeability open.
Purpose Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction remains a major long-term complication in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). While cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for right ventricular (RV) assessment, it is limited by accessibility and cost. Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), with its strain imaging capabilities, offers a promising alternative for the serial evaluation of right ventricular (RV) size and function. This study aims to compare RV volumetric and myocardial deformation parameters obtained by 2D and 3D echocardiography (2DE, 3DE) with RV function measured by CMR in patients with rTOF. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients with rTOF who underwent same day 2D, 3D echocardiography, and CMR between November 2023 and December 2024. RV volumes, ejection fraction (RVEF), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were measured across modalities. Correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves were used to evaluate the agreement and diagnostic accuracy for detecting right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction. Results Three-DE demonstrated a strong correlation with CMR for RVEDV (r = 0.95) and RVEDVi (r = 0.91), with a mild underestimation. RVEF by 3DE was significantly lower than CMR (46.4 ± 8.8% vs. 50.3 ± 7.3%, p = 0.002). RV-GLS values differed across modalities, with 3DE yielding more negative values than 2DE (−20.3 ± 4.4% vs. −18.5 ± 4.7%, p = 0.009). Among patients with CMR-RVEF <48%, both 2D and 3D Echo-derived RV-GLS were significantly reduced. Conclusion Three-dimensional echocardiography demonstrates a consistent association with CMR for the assessment of right ventricular volumes but modest underestimation of volumetric and functional parameters. Abnormal right ventricular strain was observed in patients with CMR-defined systolic dysfunction, supporting the clinical relevance of strain analysis. Overall, 3DE may serve as a feasible complementary tool for longitudinal right ventricular assessment in patients with rTOF, alongside CMR as the reference standard.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saengsin et al. (2026) studied this question. Three-dimensional echocardiography strongly correlated with CMR for right ventricular volume (r=0.95) but underestimated ejection fraction (46.4% vs 50.3%) in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: