Key result
Three-dimensional echocardiography-derived right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to two-dimensional echocardiography for identifying patients with impaired right ventricular systolic function (AUC 0.975 vs 0.930, p<0.05).
Why the study?
To compare the diagnostic performance in evaluating RV function between novel 3DE and 2DE-derived longitudinal strain.
Does 3DE-derived longitudinal strain provide better diagnostic accuracy than 2DE-derived strain for assessing right ventricular dysfunction in patients with chronic left heart failure?
Cross-Sectional (n=122)
Single-blind
Yes
Does 3DE-derived longitudinal strain provide better diagnostic accuracy than 2DE-derived strain for assessing right ventricular dysfunction in patients with chronic left heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.975% vs 0.93%
p-value: p=<0.05
3DE-derived right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain is a highly accurate and reproducible tool that outperforms 2DE for assessing RV systolic function in patients with left heart failure.
May support 3D echo for RV assessment; leaves open validation in larger prospective studies before clinical adoption.
Background A novel three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE)-derived strain analysis software specialized for right ventricular (RV) monitoring is emerging that could definitely evaluate RV free wall and interventricular septum longitudinal strain. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance in evaluating RV function between 3DE and two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE)-derived longitudinal strain. Methods Echocardiographic examinations were performed in 82 patients with RV dysfunction associated with chronic left-sided heart failure and 40 control subjects. RV dysfunction was defined as a 3DE-derived RV ejection fraction (EF) <45%. Both 2DE and 3DE-derived strain analyses were performed in all the patients to measure the longitudinal strain of RV. Results 3DE-derived peak systolic longitudinal strain of RV free wall (RV-fwLS) was significantly lower in patients with RV dysfunction compared to control subjects (-14.0±4.1 vs. -26.7±4.7%; p<0.001), and it correlated well with cardiac magnetic resonance-derived RVEF (r=0.74, p<0.001). On receiver operator characteristic analysis, a 3DE-derived RV-fwLS cutoff value of >-21.1% was most useful in identifying patients at higher risk of RV dysfunction (sensitivity: 90% and specificity: 85%), also higher than 2DE-derived strain parameters. Additionally, RV dysfunctional patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) had significantly reduced 3DE-derived RV-fwLS value than the subgroup without PH (-13.1±3.8 vs. -15.0±4.2; p<0.05). Conclusion Assessment of RV myocardial function by 3DE-derived longitudinal strain is better than 2DE in identifying patients with impaired RV systolic function. 3DE-derived strain analysis for RV should be considered as a complementary tool for assessing RV systolic function in terms of accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic left ventricular heart failure with right ventricular dysfunction (n=122). Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE)-derived longitudinal strain vs. Two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE)-derived longitudinal strain was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (Area Under the Curve) for detecting impaired right ventricular systolic function (p=<0.05). Three-dimensional echocardiography-derived right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to two-dimensional echocardiography for identifying patients with impaired right ventricular systolic function (AUC 0.975 vs 0.930, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: