Dual-dataset validated machine learning approach predicts tool wear state in machining operations, enhancing reliability.
Tool wear has a significant impact on product quality, process reliability, and overall productivity in machining operations. Although the prevailing data-driven approaches are dominantly dependent on a single dataset, traditional Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient (PCC)–based feature selection, or stand-alone machine learning models, their performances are often restricted by feature redundancy and limited model diversity. In this context, this article presents a dual-dataset validated, hybrid feature selection technique that combines PCC with Random Forest (RF) importance scores, along with a heterogeneous stacking ensemble paradigm for classification and regression tasks. The proposed approach has been evaluated using the NUAA Ideahouse dataset and an in-house experimental milling dataset based on comprehensive time-domain and frequency-domain feature extraction and preprocessing. The proposed Stacking Ensemble Learning Classifier (SELC) achieves accuracies of 0.92 and 0.95 for tool-state classification and outperforms stand-alone machine learning and ensemble learning baselines. In the case of tool wear prediction, the Stacking Ensemble Learning Regressor (SELR) achieves the highest R² values of 0.90 and 0.92 for the two datasets. The results demonstrate that the combined hybrid feature selection and stacking-based architecture has greatly enhanced generalization and prediction performance compared to conventional methods in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sayyad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: