Key result
ReDS-guided HF management is feasible in primary care and may detect early subclinical congestion.
Why the study?
Does a 1-month ReDS-guided heart failure management programme demonstrate feasibility and improve outcomes in primary care patients with heart failure?
Does a 1-month ReDS-guided heart failure management programme demonstrate feasibility and improve outcomes in primary care patients with heart failure?
A ReDS-guided heart failure management program is feasible in a rural primary care setting and may aid in early detection of subclinical congestion, though adherence to the decision-support algorithm needs improvement.
May warrant ReDS monitoring in primary care HF; extends specialist evidence but remains hypothesis-generating for outcome benefits.
AIMS: Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) technology noninvasively assesses lung congestion, but its value in primary care remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a ReDS-guided heart failure (HF) management programme in primary care. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 1-month programme, including ReDS measurements, a decision-support algorithm for diuretic adjustments, follow-up, and support for patient symptom monitoring, was provided to 18 patients with HF (mean age 81 years, mean ReDS values 33.6 ± 6.0 indicating optimal volume status) in one rural primary care centre. The feasibility areas of acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, and limited efficacy were evaluated in a mixed-methods study. Data were collected from 18 patients with HF and two healthcare professionals (HCPs) at baseline and 1-month follow-up. Acceptability: Patients found the programme satisfactory, while HCPs expressed uncertainty about using the algorithm for patients with deviating ReDS values but no worsening symptoms. Demand: Patients recognized the potential to prevent hospitalizations. Healthcare professionals perceived higher demand in rural settings. Practicality: The ReDS technology was found practical and easy to use. Implementation: Fidelity was partial, with algorithm-recommended clinical actions not always implemented. Limited efficacy: Self-care improved with a medium effect size and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), with a small effect size. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of a ReDS-guided HF management programme, which may enable early detection of subclinical congestion and improve outcomes for patients with HF in primary care settings. Further effort is necessary to refine the algorithm and improve its fidelity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mattisson et al. (2026) studied Heart failure (n=18). Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS)-guided heart failure management programme was evaluated on Feasibility (acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, and limited efficacy). A 1-month ReDS-guided heart failure management program was feasible and practical for 18 patients (mean age 81 years) in primary care, though fidelity to the algorithm was partial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: