PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Behavioral Sciences2 citationsOpen Access

Multimodal Worlds, Multilingual Selves: Fictional Linguistic Landscapes in Transnational Education

View Full Paper
OSOsman Solmaz

Key Points

  • The central aim is to explore how Fictional Linguistic Landscapes can reshape language learning for transnational youth navigating multiple languages.
  • Developed a four-phase FLL in Second Language Teaching and Learning (L2TL) cycle.
  • Proposed five pedagogical design spaces addressing linguistic hierarchies and identity issues.
  • Utilized fiction and participatory cultural practices to foster language learning.
  • FLL positions learners as active world-builders in their language learning processes.
  • Addressed issues of deficit assessments and cultural marginalization.
  • Linked creative production to explicit linguistic objectives and reflective practices.

Abstract

Transnational youth frequently navigate multiple languages and continually negotiate not only affiliation, but also the legitimacy of the languages they use within changing linguistic hierarchies. However, their educational experiences are often framed through fragmented classroom practices, deficit-based assessments, and nationally bounded curricular frameworks. In this paper, I respond by theorizing Fictional Linguistic Landscapes (FLL) as a transdisciplinary pedagogical approach that utilizes fiction and participatory cultural practices to position language learning as a form of semiotic design, critical inquiry, and identity (re)work. Grounded in linguistic landscape studies, multiliteracies pedagogy, and fan-based meaning-making, FLL positions learners as world-builders and allows them to experiment with visibility, hierarchy, and language(s) in safe fictional environments. This study outlines the four-phase FLL in Second Language Teaching and Learning (L2TL) cycle and provides five pedagogical design spaces to address issues of raciolinguistic valuation, deficit institutional representations, affective harm, peer-level marginalization, and translocal or return migrant identity negotiation. Rather than viewing imagination as an outcome of teaching, FLLinL2TL structures it as a necessary process for learning, linking creative production to explicit linguistic objectives and reflective justification. I conclude by discussing implications for classroom practice, teacher education, and future research on the potential of the FLLinL2TL approach in transnational education research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Osman Solmaz (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37aa6e48c4981c677749https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030450
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper