Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Measures accommodative loss and recovery time after topical application of cyclopentolate HCI and tropicamide in young adults, indicating drug concentration effects.
The time course of accommodative loss after the topical application of 0.5% and 1.0% concentrations of cyclopentolate HCI and tropicamide was measured over a 20‐min interval in SO age‐ and sex‐matched subjects between i 20 and 30 years of age. Computer‐assisted measures of residual accommodation pro‐vided detailed data on the temporal aspects 1 of the cycloplegia induced by these commonly utilized drugs when used alone or with the topical anesthetic proparacaine HCI. The pat‐, tern of recovery of ocular accommodation from cycloplegia was also measured over a 5‐h: period, starting 2 h after drug application. The results show that latency, depth of cyclople‐ gia, and rate of accommodative loss are re‐related to drug type and concentration, and are influenced by the iris coloration of the test eye. The rate of onset of cycloplegia was not accelerated in blue or brown irides by the pread‐ministration of proparacaine. Regardless of iris pigmentation, recovery from tropicamide cycloplegia was much faster than recovery from cyclopentolate cycloplegia. In contrast, the depth of cyclopentolate cycloplegia present in brown irides during the recovery phase was much greater than in blue irides. Mechanisms to explain these observations are proposed and clinical implications of these findings are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John V. Lovasik (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: