Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ethnographic research observes emergent curricular practices in outdoor education, suggesting new pedagogical approaches.
Background: Outdoor education curriculum is predominantly algorithmic with predetermined outcomes prioritizing social goals for individual participants. These practices neglect to attend to intra-active performativity of the human, more-than-human, curricular, material, and place elements within the outdoors. This calls for alternative pedagogies that unsettle the primacy of certainty and individualism. Purpose: The research uses curriculum-as-becoming as a theoretical framework to explore possibilities for outdoor improvisational assemblages to (re)conceptualize pedagogy and curriculum. Method: Drawing upon place-responsive and new materialist methodologies, postqualitative ethnographic field research is employed to observe performative intra-actions of outdoor elements at a discovery garden. I have relied on e-ducating my gaze to displace my view and challenge anthropocentric analysis of visual data to reconsider the ontological situation. Findings: A finding suggests one way outdoor improvisational assemblages are enacted is children having agency to engage in emergent curricular practices when affected through intra-active performativity with outdoor elements. Implications: Educators can harness emergent curricular practices of children with an intended curriculum to produce a phenomenon of indwelling and dissolve the method/subject-matter dichotomy. Such practices can strengthen human–environment relations as children and educators see themselves entangled within outdoor curricula and places.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. Gordon (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: