Key result
Ivabradine is linked to ~21% lower major cardiovascular events risk vs digoxin in HFrEF with CKD.
Why the study?
Does ivabradine reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to digoxin in adult patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and concomitant chronic kidney disease?
Cohort (n=3,140)
Yes
Does ivabradine reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to digoxin in adult patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and concomitant chronic kidney disease?
In a real-world cohort of patients with HFrEF and chronic kidney disease, ivabradine was associated with significantly lower risks of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality compared with digoxin, suggesting it may be a safer and more effective option for heart rate control in this population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ivabradine was associated with lower MACE risk versus digoxin in HFrEF-CKD; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
INTRODUCTION: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) commonly coexists with chronic kidney disease (CKD), conferring a markedly increased risk of adverse outcomes. Ivabradine and digoxin are both used for heart rate control in HFrEF, but their comparative effectiveness in patients with CKD remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including heart failure exacerbation (HFE) and all-cause mortality, between ivabradine and digoxin in patients with concomitant HFrEF and CKD. METHODS: Using the TriNetX global research network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study including adults with HFrEF and CKD between 2015 and 2025. Patients prescribed ivabradine were propensity score-matched 1:1 to those receiving digoxin based on demographic, clinical, laboratory, and medication variables. The primary outcome was MACE (composite of HFE or all-cause mortality). Secondary outcomes included each component separately. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: After matching, 3,140 patients were included (1,570 per group). Ivabradine use was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE compared with digoxin (26.8% vs. 31.6%; HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.90; p < 0.001). Ivabradine also reduced the risk of HFE (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.72-0.97; p = 0.015) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.85; p < 0.001). Subgroup and negative-control analyses yielded consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, real-world cohort of patients with HFrEF and CKD, ivabradine was associated with lower risks of MACE, HFE, and all-cause mortality compared with digoxin. Ivabradine may represent a safer and more effective heart rate-lowering option for this high-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n=3,140). Ivabradine vs. Digoxin was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), composite of heart failure exacerbation or all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.90, p=<0.001). Ivabradine was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with digoxin in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and chronic kidney disease.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: