Key result
Ivabradine is not linked to lower CV death or HF hospitalization in acute decompensated HFrEF.
Why the study?
While ivabradine improves heart rate control and prognosis in chronic heart failure, its applicability and safety in acute decompensated heart failure remain underexplored.
Does ivabradine reduce the composite of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization in patients with acute decompensated HFrEF who are intolerant to beta-blockers?
Cohort (n=4,163)
Yes
Does ivabradine reduce the composite of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization in patients with acute decompensated HFrEF who are intolerant to beta-blockers?
Hazard Ratio: 1.1 (95% CI 0.94–1.29)
In patients with acute decompensated HFrEF intolerant to beta-blockers, the initiation of ivabradine during admission did not significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization.
May support ivabradine in β-blocker-intolerant acute decompensated HFrEF; leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: While ivabradine has demonstrated benefits in heart rate control and prognosis for chronic heart failure patients, its application in acute decompensated heart failure remains underexplored. HYPOTHESIS: For patients with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who are intolerant to β-blockers or unable to further titrate their dosage, the use of ivabradine is hypothesized to be effective and safe is improving outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter database analysis included patients with hospitalized decompensated heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤40% from June 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. The exclusion criteria were a baseline heart rate of <70 bpm, previous use of ivabradine, mortality during admission, existing atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: Of the 4163 HFrEF patients analyzed, 684 (16.4%) were administered ivabradine during their index admission. After matching, there were 617 patients in either group. The results indicated that ivabradine use was not significantly associated with the risk of the primary composite outcome (hazard ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.94-1.29). Similarly, the risk of secondary outcomes and adverse renal events did not significantly differ between the ivabradine and non-ivabradine cohorts (all p > .05). CONCLUSION: For hospitalized acute decompensated heart failure patients who are intolerant to β-blockers or cannot further titrate them, ivabradine offers a consistent therapeutic effect. No significant disparities were noted between the ivabradine and non-ivabradine groups in heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsai et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=4,163). Ivabradine vs. Non-ivabradine was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.29). In patients with acute decompensated HFrEF, ivabradine use was not significantly associated with the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.94-1.29).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: