Key result
Predischarge prescription of ivabradine was associated with lower 1-year all-cause mortality (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.28-0.74; P=0.002) compared to no ivabradine in acute decompensated HFrEF.
Why the study?
Ivabradine is used in chronic HFrEF with sinus heart rate ≥70 bpm, but its administration for acute HFrEF remains a concern.
Does ivabradine administered at discharge reduce mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in patients with acute decompensated HFrEF?
Cohort (n=876)
Yes
Does ivabradine administered at discharge reduce mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in patients with acute decompensated HFrEF?
Hazard Ratio: 0.45 (95% CI 0.28–0.74)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.2% vs 14%
p-value: p=0.002
In a real-world cohort, ivabradine prescribed at discharge for acute decompensated HFrEF was associated with significantly lower 1-year mortality and heart failure rehospitalization.
May support predischarge ivabradine in acute decompensated HFrEF; hypothesis-generating and does not yet justify practice change.
AIMS: Ivabradine has been used in patients who have chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and concomitant sinus heart rate ≥70 bpm. This administration for acute HFrEF remains a concern. This study used a real-world multicentre database to investigate the effects of ivabradine among patients with acute decompensated HFrEF before discharge. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study retrospectively identified patients with acute decompensated HFrEF who were administered ivabradine at discharge from two multicentre HF databases. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounders. Cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and recurrent HF rehospitalization risks were then compared between those with and without ivabradine treatment. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 876 patients (age, 60.7 ± 14.6 years; female, 23.2%; left ventricular ejection fraction, 28.2% ± 7.8%; and heart rate at discharge, 84.3 ± 13.8 bpm) were included in the final analysis, including 292 and 584 patients with and without ivabradine treatment at discharge, respectively. No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. At 1 year follow-up, patients in the ivabradine group had significantly lower heart rates (77.6 ± 14.7 vs. 81.1 ± 16.3 bpm; P = 0.005) and lower HF severity symptoms (New York Heart Association Functional class, 2.1 ± 0.7 vs. 2.3 ± 0.9; P < 0.001) than those from the non-ivabradine group. Ivabradine users had significantly lower risks of 1 year cardiovascular mortality (5.8 vs. 12.2 per 100-person year; P = 0.003), all-cause mortality (7.2 vs. 14.0 per 100-person year; P = 0.003), and total HF rehospitalization (42.3 vs. 72.6 per 100-person year; P < 0.001) than non-ivabradine users. Following multivariate analysis, the predischarge prescription of ivabradine remained independently associated with lower 1 year all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.74; P = 0.002) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.72; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The current study findings suggest that ivabradine treatment is associated with reduced risks of cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and HF rehospitalization within 1 year among patients with acute decompensated HFrEF in real-world populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute decompensated HFrEF (n=876). Ivabradine vs. No ivabradine treatment was evaluated on 1 year all-cause mortality (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.74, p=0.002). Predischarge prescription of ivabradine was associated with lower 1-year all-cause mortality (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.28-0.74; P=0.002) compared to no ivabradine in acute decompensated HFrEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: