⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

November 12, 2025Peer Community In ArchaeologyOpen Access

Review of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1/Reviewer#2

Quentin Drillat Killian Regnier

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The aim is to evaluate software options for archaeological field documentation and recommend effective tools.
Review existing software tools: iDig, ODK, and QField.
Analyze usability and efficiency of each software in archaeological contexts.
Compare features and functionalities relevant to field documentation.
Identified strengths and weaknesses of iDig, ODK, and QField.
Recommended QField for its user-friendly interface and advanced features.
Highlighted the need for improved integration between different software options.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Implication

Review highlights software transitions for archaeological field documentation, suggesting improved methodologies.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Drillat et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37bb3b34aaaeb1a67e5fb https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.archaeo.100696.rev12

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Review of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1/Reviewer#1Review · 2025
2Review of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1/Reviewer#3Review · 2025
3Recommendation of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#2Original Research · 2026 · 1 citations
4Author response of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1Original Research · 2026
5Decision Revise: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1Original Research · 2025

More related papers

Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation2026
Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation2026
Review of: Comparative review of recent developments in archaeological predictive models and automatic structure detection. Round#1/Reviewer#22025

More from Peer Community In Archaeology

Recommendation of: Bridging Interdisciplinary Research Data Management and Data Science through Modular Research Processes. Round#2Sat,
Author response of: Evaluating commercial DNA extraction kits for bacterial community profiling in waterlogged archaeological wood. Round#1Mon,