PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Peer Community In Archaeology0 citationsOpen Access

Review of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1/Reviewer#3

QDQuentin DrillatKRKillian Regnier

Key Points

  • To evaluate software tools for archaeological field documentation and recommend effective solutions.
  • Reviewed existing software tools iDig, ODK, and QField.
  • Analyzed functionalities and ease of use for archaeological purposes.
  • Comparative assessment of software capabilities in data collection.
  • Identified strengths and weaknesses of each software tool.
  • Recommended QField for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive features.
  • Highlighted improvements in data accuracy and efficiency with better software integration.

Abstract

A recommendation of: Kyriakos Sgouropoulos, Periklis Chrysafakoglou, Ilias Ladenis Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19054070

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Drillat et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37be2b34aaaeb1a67ec4ahttps://doi.org/10.24072/pci.archaeo.100696.rev13
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper