⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

November 6, 2025Peer Community In ArchaeologyOpen Access

Review of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1/Reviewer#3

Quentin Drillat Killian Regnier

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

To evaluate software tools for archaeological field documentation and recommend effective solutions.
Reviewed existing software tools iDig, ODK, and QField.
Analyzed functionalities and ease of use for archaeological purposes.
Comparative assessment of software capabilities in data collection.
Identified strengths and weaknesses of each software tool.
Recommended QField for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive features.
Highlighted improvements in data accuracy and efficiency with better software integration.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Implication

Review highlights software integration for archaeological documentation, suggesting improved field practices.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Drillat et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37be2b34aaaeb1a67ec4a https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.archaeo.100696.rev13

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Review of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1/Reviewer#2Review · 2025
2Review of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1/Reviewer#1Review · 2025
3Recommendation of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#2Original Research · 2026 · 1 citations
4Author response of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1Original Research · 2026
5Decision Revise: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1Original Research · 2025

More related papers

Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation2026
Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation2026
Review of: Comparative review of recent developments in archaeological predictive models and automatic structure detection. Round#1/Reviewer#32025

More from Peer Community In Archaeology

Recommendation of: Bridging Interdisciplinary Research Data Management and Data Science through Modular Research Processes. Round#2Sat,
Author response of: Evaluating commercial DNA extraction kits for bacterial community profiling in waterlogged archaeological wood. Round#1Mon,