PulseExploreJournal ClubTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Peer Community In ArchaeologyOpen Access

Review of: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1/Reviewer#1

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

QDQuentin DrillatKRKillian Regnier

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This review evaluates software tools for archaeological documentation, suggesting better practices for fieldwork.

Key Points

  • The review aims to assess various software options for archaeological field documentation and their effectiveness.
  • Reviewed software tools including iDig, ODK, and QField
  • Analyzed usability and practical applications in the field
  • Suggested best practices for effective archaeological documentation
  • Identified strengths and weaknesses of each software tool
  • Found that QField offers superior usability for field documentation
  • Recommended integrating different software for improved efficiency in archaeological projects

Cite This Study

Drillat et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37bf3b34aaaeb1a67ee5dhttps://doi.org/10.24072/pci.archaeo.100696.rev11
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share