Key result
Left bundle branch area defibrillation with standard leads achieves ~88% success and is linked to improved LVEF.
Why the study?
Left bundle branch area defibrillation is an off-label procedure lacking sufficient real-world implantation and follow-up data.
Does left bundle branch area defibrillation using standard ICD leads provide safe and effective defibrillation and pacing in patients requiring conduction system pacing?
Cohort (n=163)
Yes
Does left bundle branch area defibrillation using standard ICD leads provide safe and effective defibrillation and pacing in patients requiring conduction system pacing?
Left bundle branch area defibrillation using standard stylet-driven ICD leads is feasible and safe, demonstrating stable electrical parameters, effective defibrillation, and improved LVEF at mid-term follow-up.
May enable CSP with defibrillation using standard ICD leads; extends options for HF patients but leaves open randomized confirmation.
Abstract Background Left bundle branch area defibrillation (LBBAD) therapy is currently an off-label procedure. Nevertheless, it is a promising technique that reduces the number of leads in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients who require conduction system pacing. Objectives: to collect real-world data on LBBAD implantation and follow-up. Methods Retrospective periprocedural and follow-up data on electrocardiographic and electrical parameters, transthoracic echocardiography and clinical outcome were assembled from 12 international centres. Results In total, 163 patients (age 67±12 years, 137 males) were included. Implantation success rate was 88%. Defibrillation testing was performed in 85 patients and was effective in all cases. Paced unipolar QRS duration was 125 [119-135] ms with a V6R-wave peak-time of 76 [70-85] ms, a V6-V1 interpeak interval of 44 [45-54 ] ms. Capture threshold was 0.8 [0.5-1.1] V/0.4ms, sensing amplitude was 9.0 [6.2-12] mV and pacing and high-voltage impedances were 580 [493-650] Ohms and 66 [60-75] Ohms. Electrical parameters remained favourable over a follow-up of 8 [3-13] months. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved from 30 [26-35] % to 36 [31-46]% at last follow-up (P<0.001). A total of 13 appropriate and effective shocks were documented, affecting eight patients (4.9%). No ineffective shocks were reported. Two LBBAD leads were explanted more than one year after implantation without any complication. No deaths were related to LBBAD. Conclusion LBBAD with standard stylet-driven lead is safe and feasible, with stable electrical, ECG, and echocardiographic parameters at mid-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imnadze et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ICD patients requiring conduction system pacing (n=163). Left bundle branch area defibrillation (LBBAD) was evaluated on Implantation success rate. Left bundle branch area defibrillation using standard stylet-driven leads achieved an 88% implantation success rate and improved LVEF from 30% to 36% (P<0.001) over an 8-month follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: