Key result
Apical RV lead positioning is linked to higher lead perforation risk.
Why the study?
Does apical right ventricular lead positioning increase the risk of lead perforation in patients undergoing RV lead implantation?
Cohort (n=1,923)
Does apical right ventricular lead positioning increase the risk of lead perforation in patients undergoing RV lead implantation?
Apical positioning of right ventricular leads is associated with a significantly higher risk of lead perforation compared to non-apical positioning, though the absolute risk remains low.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution with apical RV leads is warranted; leaves open optimal positioning pending randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) lead perforation is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Although apical lead placement has been proposed as a risk factor, its clinical significance remains uncertain. This study evaluated whether apical RV lead positioning increases perforation risk and characterized the clinical features, diagnosis, and outcomes of affected patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 1,923 patients who underwent RV lead implantation between January 2002 and June 2023. Patients were categorized into Apex and Non-apex groups according to lead tip location. RV lead perforation cases were identified based on chest radiography findings. Baseline characteristics and the incidence and management of lead perforation were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 1,923 patients, 503 (26.2%) were assigned to the Apex group and 1,420 (73.8%) to the Non-apex group. RV lead perforation occurred in 5 patients (0.26%): 4 in the Apex group and 1 in the Non-apex group (0.79% vs. 0.07%, p = 0.018). Perforations were diagnosed intraoperatively or within 1-3 days post-implantation, primarily using chest computed tomography. Clinical presentations ranged from asymptomatic findings to chest pain. All patients underwent percutaneous RV lead extraction and revision, without major complications. CONCLUSION: Apical RV lead positioning was significantly associated with an increased risk of lead perforation. Although perforation was uncommon, prompt diagnosis and individualized management ensured favorable outcomes. Careful attention to lead tip location during implantation may help mitigate this risk. Given the small number of events, this finding should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manabe et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Right ventricular lead implantation (n=1,923). Apical RV lead positioning vs. Non-apex RV lead positioning was evaluated on Right ventricular lead perforation (p=0.018). Apical right ventricular lead positioning was associated with a significantly higher risk of lead perforation compared to non-apical positioning (0.79% vs. 0.07%, p=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: