Key result
Autologous pericardial soft-ring annuloplasty linked to ~31% smaller TR area vs prosthetic rings at 96 months.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the long-term efficacy of autologous pericardial soft-ring annuloplasty versus prosthetic ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation secondary to rheumatic heart disease.
Does autologous pericardial soft-ring annuloplasty improve long-term TR control and right-heart remodeling compared to prosthetic ring annuloplasty in patients with rheumatic functional tricuspid regurgitation?
Cohort (n=251)
No
Does autologous pericardial soft-ring annuloplasty improve long-term TR control and right-heart remodeling compared to prosthetic ring annuloplasty in patients with rheumatic functional tricuspid regurgitation?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.55% vs 5.12%
p-value: p=0.010
Autologous pericardial soft-ring annuloplasty may provide better long-term control of tricuspid regurgitation and right atrial reverse remodeling than prosthetic rings in rheumatic heart disease patients.
May favor autologous rings over prosthetic in rheumatic TR; extends long-term durability data but remains hypothesis-generating pending RCTs.
Background To compare the long-term efficacy of autologous pericardial soft-ring annuloplasty (P-TVP) versus prosthetic ring annuloplasty (A-TVP) for functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) secondary to rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Methods A total of 251 consecutive RHD patients undergoing tricuspid annuloplasty from December 2013 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 139 underwent P-TVP and 112 received A-TVP. Propensity score matching (1:1) yielded 64 comparable pairs. Follow-up at 6,24,48 and 96 months assessed TR recurrence and right-heart remodeling. Multiple imputation was applied for partially missing follow-up data. Results Early outcomes at 6 and 24 months were similar between groups. However, recurrence of moderate TR was significantly lower in the P-TVP group at 48 and 96 months (both P < 0.05). Greater right-atrial reverse remodeling was observed in the P-TVP group at 48 months ( P < 0.05), while right-ventricular diameter remained comparable at 96 months ( P > 0.05). No increase in procedure-related complications was observed in the P-TVP group. Conclusions In this hypothesis-generating study, autologous pericardial soft-ring annuloplasty was associated with more favorable long-term TR control and right atrial reverse remodeling compared with prosthetic ring annuloplasty, despite similar early outcomes. These findings suggest a potential advantage of flexible biological annuloplasty in selected RHD patients, but should be interpreted with caution due to the modest sample size, incomplete follow-up, and retrospective design. Prospective multicenter studies are required to confirm these observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Functional tricuspid regurgitation secondary to rheumatic heart disease (n=251). Autologous pericardial soft-ring annuloplasty (P-TVP) vs. Prosthetic ring annuloplasty (A-TVP) was evaluated on Tricuspid regurgitation area at 96 months (cm2) (p=0.010). Autologous pericardial soft-ring annuloplasty significantly reduced tricuspid regurgitation area to 3.55 cm2 compared to 5.12 cm2 with prosthetic rings at 96 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: