Retrospective analysis finds no significant differences in outcomes of treatment sequencing in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, suggesting personalized approaches.
Background: The optimal sequencing of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains uncertain, particularly in Asian populations. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 110 patients with mCRC who sequentially received both agents between 2011 and 2025. Patients were categorized into regorafenib followed by FTD/TPI (Rego → FTD/TPI, n = 88) and FTD/TPI followed by regorafenib (FTD/TPI → Rego, n = 22). Co-primary endpoints were time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS). Propensity score-based weighting methods, including stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (primary analysis), were used to adjust for baseline imbalances. Multivariable Cox regression was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between treatment sequences. In the primary analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) for TTD was 1.01 (95% CI 0.71–1.43), and for OS was 1.19 (95% CI 0.67–2.12), with FTD/TPI → Rego as reference. Median TTD was 6.8 versus 8.9 months, and median OS was 14.6 versus 20.2 months, respectively. Conclusions: Clinical outcomes were comparable regardless of treatment order, supporting individualized sequencing decisions in refractory mCRC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: