Key result
Direct Faradrive sheath access linked to a ~5-minute shorter procedure versus conventional SL0 exchange.
Why the study?
Direct large-bore sheath access may simplify workflow and reduce resource use compared to conventional standard sheath exchange during transseptal puncture for pulsed field ablation.
Does direct Faradrive sheath access reduce total procedural time and improve workflow efficiency in patients undergoing PFA-guided PVI compared to conventional SL0 sheath exchange?
Cohort (n=140)
No
Does direct Faradrive sheath access reduce total procedural time and improve workflow efficiency in patients undergoing PFA-guided PVI compared to conventional SL0 sheath exchange?
Direct large-bore sheath access for transseptal puncture during PFA-guided PVI simplifies the workflow, significantly reducing procedural time, fluoroscopy exposure, and costs without compromising safety.
Direct Faradrive access simplifies PFA-PVI workflow without safety compromise; hypothesis-generating for routine adoption pending RCTs.
Transseptal puncture (TSP) is a critical step in Pulsed field ablation (PFA) procedures. Conventional workflows often require initial septal access using a standard transseptal sheath followed by exchange to accommodate large-bore PFA delivery systems. Direct large-bore sheath access may simplify the workflow and reduce procedural resource utilization. To compare procedural efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of a conventional SL0 sheath exchange strategy versus direct Faradrive sheath access for fluoroscopy-guided TSP in PFA-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In this prospective, single-center study, 140 consecutive patients undergoing first-time PFA-guided PVI were included. The first 70 patients underwent TSP using an SL0 sheath followed by sheath exchange to a Faradrive sheath. The subsequent 70 patients underwent direct TSP using Faradrive sheath without exchange. All procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance without intracardiac or transesophageal echocardiography. The primary endpoint was total procedural time prespecified as one objective marker of workflow efficiency. Secondary endpoints included fluoroscopy duration, radiation exposure, number of transseptal puncture (TSP) attempts, sheath crossovers, acute procedural success, complication rates, and procedural cost analysis. Total procedural time was shorter in the direct Faradrive group compared with the SL0 exchange group (35.0 [30.0–40.0] min vs. 40.0 [34.3–50.0] min; p = 0.001). Fluoroscopy time (5.98 [4.57–7.94] min vs. 8.63 [6.04–11.7] min; p < 0.001) and radiation dose (567 [302–730] vs. 715 [434–1002] cGy·cm²; p = 0.001) were also lower with direct access. Time to septal crossing, number of puncture attempts, first-pass success, and acute PVI success were comparable between groups. One air embolism occurred during sheath exchange in the SL0 group without long-term sequelae. No hemolysis, acute kidney injury, stroke, tamponade, or deaths were observed. Estimated per-case cost reduction with direct access was €171. In a fluoroscopy-guided workflow, direct large-bore Faradrive sheath access for transseptal puncture during PFA-guided pulmonary vein isolation was associated with shorter procedural and fluoroscopy times and lower procedural costs without compromising acute procedural safety or success. These findings support procedural workflow simplification by eliminating sheath exchange in experienced operators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feher et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=140). Direct Faradrive sheath access vs. Conventional SL0 sheath exchange was evaluated on Total procedural time (minutes) (p=0.001). Direct large-bore Faradrive sheath access for transseptal puncture reduced median total procedural time to 35.0 minutes compared to 40.0 minutes with conventional SL0 sheath exchange.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: