Key result
Direct RF transseptal puncture during PFA-PVI proves safe and efficient with a 1.9% complication rate.
Why the study?
Transseptal puncture is a critical step in PFA-PVI, and whether direct puncture using an RF needle through a large-bore sheath enhances procedural safety and efficiency remained to be evaluated.
Is direct transseptal puncture using an RF needle and large-bore sheath safe and efficient during PFA-PVI with a penta-spline catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=108)
No
Is direct transseptal puncture using an RF needle and large-bore sheath safe and efficient during PFA-PVI with a penta-spline catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation?
A standardized direct transseptal puncture workflow using an RF needle and large-bore sheath during PFA-PVI is safe and efficient, yielding short procedure times and a low complication rate.
Feasibility of direct RF TSP in PFA-PVI is supported; leaves open need for randomized safety comparisons.
Background Transseptal puncture (TSP) is a critical step in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) performed with pulsed field ablation (PFA) using a penta-spline catheter. A standardized workflow employing direct TSP with a radiofrequency (RF) needle through a large-bore sheath may enhance procedural safety and efficiency. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and performance of this approach in a real- world clinical setting. Methods A total of 108 consecutive patients undergoing PFA-PVI were prospectively analyzed. All patients underwent first-time PVI with no prior ablation procedures. Direct TSP was performed using an RF needle via a large-bore sheath. Procedural parameters, time to TSP, left atrial dwell time, the need for RF energy delivery through the needle, and procedure-related complications were recorded. PFA applications were delivered in both flower and basket configurations. The median total number of PFA applications per procedure was 48 (range 32–64), distributed across both configurations. Results The mean patient age was 64 ± 12 years, and 41.7% were female. Paroxysmal AF was present in 64.8% of patients, persistent AF in 29.6%, and long-standing persistent AF in 5.6%. The mean procedure duration was 46 ± 12 min, with a TSP time of 15 ± 5 min and a left atrial dwell time of 30.4 ± 10.2 min. Mean fluoroscopy time was 13 ± 5 min, corresponding to a radiation dose of 637 ± 450 Gy·cm². RF energy was applied in 48.1% of procedures. Subgroup analysis (RF applied vs. not applied) revealed no significant differences in TSP time (p = 0.77) or fluoroscopy time (p = 0.14), but a significantly lower radiation dose when RF energy was used (p = 0.005). The overall complication rate was 1.9% (one pericardial tamponade, one stroke). No deaths, atrioesophageal fistulas, or permanent phrenic nerve palsies occurred. Conclusion A standardized direct TSP workflow using an RF needle and a large-bore sheath during PFA-PVI was safe and efficient, allowing short procedure times, reduced radiation exposure, and a very low complication rate. Larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate their generalizability across operators and centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atiah et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=108). Direct transseptal puncture using an RF needle and large-bore sheath was evaluated on Feasibility, safety, and performance (including procedure times and complications). Direct transseptal puncture using an RF needle and large-bore sheath during PFA-PVI was safe and efficient, with an overall complication rate of 1.9%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: