This analysis maps survival factors in new ventures, revealing that product-market fit drives endurance, suggesting new interventions.
Purpose This study aims to model the causal architecture of new venture survival from an enabling-conditions perspective. Design/methodology/approach Using cognitive mapping and Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM), the authors structure causal relations among 43 prioritized survival factors from a multidisciplinary expert panel and validate the hierarchy via MICMAC. Findings Product–market fit drives survival, human and strategic capabilities mediate it and financial outcomes are downstream consequences, reframing financial fragility as a symptom rather than a root cause. Originality/value The resulting framework supports diagnosis and intervention prioritization based on causal dependencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Correia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: