Why the study?
Does extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO)-supported primary PCI improve prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by profound cardiogenic shock?
Does extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO)-supported primary PCI improve prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by profound cardiogenic shock?
ECMO-supported primary PCI is highlighted as a potentially effective therapeutic option to improve clinical outcomes in patients with AMI complicated by profound cardiogenic shock.
May support ECMO-supported PCI in profound AMI shock; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Despite advancements in pharmacological therapy and refinement of the tools and technique of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass surgery, patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by profound cardiogenic shock (CS) still have unacceptably high in-hospital mortality and unfavorable long-term outcome. Thus, there is an imminent need of a new and safe treatment modality in the management of AMI complicated by profound CS. Growing evidence suggests that extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO)-supported primary PCI is an effective therapeutic option for saving lives under such conditions. In this review, we describe and interpret the potential role of circulatory mechanical support by ECMO in the setting of AMI complicated by profound CS for improving clinical outcomes. (Circ J 2016; 80: 572-578).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sung et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: