Structured Functional Assessment Pathway and Pharmacological Optimization During Cardiovascular Rehabilitation in Chronic Heart Failure: A Retrospective Tertiary Center Study

Introduction: Optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy in chronic heart failure remains challenging in real-world practice, particularly outside settings with routine cardiopulmonary exercise testing. In this context, cardiovascular rehabilitation can improve functional capacity, symptoms, and quality of life, while structured follow-up may also facilitate treatment adjustment. We therefore evaluated whether exposure to a structured multimodal functional assessment pathway, embedded within a more intensive follow-up model, was associated with pharmacological optimization and functional change in chronic heart failure. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study including adults with chronic heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction managed in a tertiary university clinic. Patients were classified according to documented exposure to an integrated pathway that combined standardized 6 min walk testing, heart rate dynamics, oxygen saturation response, perceived exertion, validated quality-of-life assessment, and prespecified interim reassessment, versus usual care. The integrated pathway involved more frequent clinical contact than usual care. The primary outcome was change in 6 min walk distance over 6 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in heart rate recovery, oxygen saturation nadir, Borg perceived exertion score, quality-of-life score, intensity of guideline-directed medical therapy, treatment intensification rates, and heart failure hospitalization. Results: The study included 250 patients with comparable baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Patients managed within the structured pathway showed greater improvement in 6 min walk distance at 6 months than those receiving usual care, together with more pronounced improvement in secondary functional parameters and quality-of-life scores. Pharmacological optimization, reflected by higher uptake and intensification of guideline-directed medical therapy, also occurred more frequently in the structured pathway group. The integrated group, however, also had higher follow-up intensity, which limits causal interpretation of the observed between-group differences. Conclusions: In this real-world heart failure cohort, exposure to a structured care pathway combining repeated multimodal functional profiling with closer follow-up was associated with greater functional improvement and more intensive pharmacological optimization. These findings should be interpreted as pathway-level associations rather than proof that functional assessment alone drove benefit, and they require prospective validation.