Qualitative analysis reveals elite bargaining hampers sustainable peace in South Sudan, indicating serious flaws.
This paper critically examines the implementation of the 2018 Revitalised Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS), arguing that the process has been characterised by elite bargaining that prioritises power-sharing over transformative peace. Through a qualitative case study, it analyses the stalled progress in security sector reform, transitional justice, and constitution-making. The findings reveal that the agreement's institutional design, while creating a fragile ceasefire, has entrenched a political economy of conflict and failed to address the root causes of violence. The discussion contends that without meaningful inclusion and accountability, the R-ARCSS risks perpetuating a cycle of unstable elite pacts rather than fostering a sustainable peace.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abraham Kuol Nyuon (Ph.D) (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: