Analysis highlights systemic drivers of conflict in South Sudan, suggesting recalibrated international engagement is essential.
This perspective piece argues that the persistent fragility of peace in South Sudan stems from a fundamental misalignment between the formal architecture of the Revitalised Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS) and the entrenched political economy of the state. It contends that elite bargains, centred on resource access and militarised patronage, have co-opted the peace process, rendering key provisions on security sector reform, transitional justice, and constitution-making largely inert. The analysis moves beyond technical implementation failures to examine how the logic of competitive kleptocracy undermines institutional transformation. The conclusion posits that sustainable peace requires a recalibration of international engagement to directly address these systemic drivers of conflict, rather than merely managing their symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abraham Kuol Nyuon (Ph.D) (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: