Why the study?
Does non-contact video imaging with blind source separation accurately measure cardiac pulse rate compared to a finger BVP sensor?
Population
Human participants
Comparison
Non-contact, automated cardiac pulse measurement… vs FDA-approved finger blood volume pulse sensor
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
May advance contactless monitoring technologies; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Does non-contact video imaging with blind source separation accurately measure cardiac pulse rate compared to a finger BVP sensor?
A novel, low-cost, automated video-based method using blind source separation can accurately measure heart rate without contact, even with motion artifacts or multiple subjects.
Poh et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: